What counts as technical SEO here?
It usually includes crawl and indexation review, duplicate-page and redirect cleanup, site architecture, internal-linking support, template issues, rendering concerns, and launch or migration QA.
Search visibility
I help teams fix crawl, indexation, redirect, template, and internal-link problems that keep important pages from performing.
The strongest technical work ranks fixes by business value, then checks whether important pages become easier to crawl, measure, and convert.
Project description
A large ecommerce overhaul had to account for years of URL changes, missed legacy redirects, and priority pages that needed stronger copy during the rebuild.
Approach
Mapped legacy URLs and externally linked pages, routed old authority into relevant live destinations, guided category copy updates, and repaired ecommerce tracking blind spots.
Results
Skills & deliverables: Ecommerce SEO, Migration planning, Category architecture, Technical SEO, Tracking cleanup, Launch QA
The strongest technical work in these case studies centered on priority categories, products, service pages, legacy URLs, and templates with real search or revenue upside.
Not every crawl issue deserves attention. I focus on the fixes most likely to strengthen important pages, preserve authority, improve paths, or clean up measurement.
That can mean redirect cleanup, legacy URL recovery, duplicate-page consolidation, or routing old authority into the closest useful live page.
Cleaner visual templates are not enough if they bury priority collections, weaken contextual links, or make important sections harder to discover.
Technical SEO is only useful if the cleaned-up pages become easier to find, easier to measure, or better able to produce leads, purchases, and revenue.
It usually includes crawl and indexation review, duplicate-page and redirect cleanup, site architecture, internal-linking support, template issues, rendering concerns, and launch or migration QA.
No. I can audit and prioritize, but I also help shape implementation, validate fixes, and support the follow-through that makes technical work useful.
Sometimes yes, especially when strong pages are being held back by obvious crawl, duplication, or indexation problems. Larger sites or deeper structural issues usually take longer to clean up and validate.
Yes. That is common. I aim to translate technical SEO work into clearer priorities and fix notes so your team can move without guesswork.
Share the context, and I'll help identify where we should start first.